'...features that help species to prevail through catastrophes need not be the sources of success in normal times.' -SJ Gould

30 December 2007

Coexisting ecotypes

Moore et al. in a 1998 issue of Nature talk about the co-occurrence of ecotypes, specifically, the coexistence of two, physiologically-distinct, bacterial ecotypes in the North Atlantic. This coexistence helps the population, on the whole, to persist over a wider range of light conditions than would otherwise be possible if the population was homogeneous.
Are there other examples of closely related ecotypes that exist together in a community, but are not necessarily specialists nor distinct species? Do figs qualify? According to Janzen (1970) the co-occurrence of closely related species makes little sense in the context of community disease resistance.
Is plasticity compromised for coexistence?
There is the example of two species of lizard from the genus Anolis (described in a 2003 Ecology article written by Cavender-Bares & Wilczek) that coexist on islands in the Lesser Antilles, but only when one species is large and the other small. The reasons for their coexistence differ from the northern to the southern islands. Lone island-inhabiting lizards, meanwhile, are of an intermediate size. Which lizard population, the lone or the coexisting, has a better chance of survival, all else being equal? Is the lone more phenotypically plastic? Or does the ability to coexist require or impart behavioral flexibility? Do the coexisting and closely related exchange useful information (more readily than the coexisting and distantly related)? Surely any information exchanged between the closely related and co-occurring will have greater ecological relevance than that exchanged between the distantly related and co-occurring.
If the principle of phylogenetic repulsion ensures that communities are made up of distantly related species which compete only to some tolerable extent, then what happens when the process is disrupted by anthropogenic activity? Deforestation in West Africa, for instance, is bringing guenon species into contact with one another and resulting in hybridization. Will these hybrids become more disease-prone or will they persist over a wider habitat range, including within agricultural ecotones? Are these hybrid guenons fluid ecotypes? Yes.

27 December 2007

What are fluid ecotypes?

I’ll begin with a definition. Fluid ecotypes: those organisms living in an ecotone, a zone of transition. More than living, they are capable of successfully inhabiting such zones. These fluid ecotypes…can they be likened to generalists, or to Archilochus’s fox? I’m not sure yet. I thank a certain fluid ecotype for once introducing me to the fox metaphor. For more, see typology. Although ‘foxes’ have been increasingly punished in human society, which rewards over-specialization, I think that the zeitgeist is in transition. There may finally be forums where the hedgehog-like and the fox-like can meet, such as the Edge, where the fox-like can revel in their foxiness. Does there exist a hedgehog-fox mongrel? A continuum with fox and hedgehog on opposing sides? To what extent is the distribution skewed toward hedgehogs in Western society?
Are the ecotone-inhabiting in a class of their own? I believe that the answer to the latter is ‘yes’. I plan to ultimately devote this blog to them- be they monkeys or men.